‘Kosher’ Schakowsky: Still AIPAC’s Number One Darling

Fierce Competition Between Two Jewish Candidates in Chicago

ShakowskyAccording to the latest reports the degree of allegiance to Israel and its lobby has taken center stage in two Chicago election campaigns for a congressional seat. As far as the two candidates, the incumbent Jan Schakowsky and the Republican Joel Pollak, are concerned, this race and the issues are not about the tanking economy, over a trillion of dollars in deficit or unemployment, neither it is about our disastrous state of civil liberties, quagmire state of our wars, or speedily declining foreign standing and dignity. No.  The number one issue for both candidates is the level of allegiance to the State of Israel, the approval rating from Israel’s number one US lobby AIPAC, and the degree of religiosity in Judaism. The main question and top competition arena in Schakowsky v. Pollak is ‘Who does and will do more and better to represent and protect the Jewish interest?’ And so far our current representative, Ms. Jan Schakowsky seems to be way ahead (the emphasis are all mine;-):

Pollak tends to carry a map of the Middle East with him on the campaign trail, and to present it to the voters. Last week he visited the reform synagogue of B'nai Jehoshua Beth Elohim in Deerfield, Illinois, which hosted a debate between the two candidates. He spread the copy of the Google map in his possession and announced to the audience: "My focus tonight will be Israel."

Pollak's main obstacle is that Schakowsky was labeled 'kosher' by the pro-Israel community, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a prominent lobby group, has praised her work.

I’d say Schakowsky is way ahead since her closeted ties and certain long-term commitments go beyond AIPAC, and extend to other Israeli and Turkish subsidiaries all operating under the main lobby’s umbrella.

ISFlagDo you remember the cover-page story on Jan Schakowsky’s questionable loyalties and skeletons last November? Don’t be hard on yourself if you don’t have a clue since the Israel-Loving mainstream media made sure it stayed quiet and censored. The AmCon Magazine dared to explore the topic after my under oath testimony in Schmidt v. Krikorian case:

So the FBI was monitoring these connections going from a congressman to a congressman’s assistant to a foreign individual who is connected with intelligence to other intelligence people who are located at different embassies in Washington. And all of this information is in an FBI file somewhere?
EDMONDS: Two sets of FBI files, but the AIPAC-related files and the Turkish files ended up converging in one. The FBI agents believed that they were looking at the same operation. It didn’t start with AIPAC originally. It started with the Israeli Embassy. The original targets were intelligence officers under diplomatic cover in the Turkish Embassy and the Israeli Embassy. It was those contacts that led to the American Turkish Council and the Assembly of Turkish American Associations and then to AIPAC fronting for the Israelis. It moved forward from there.


GIRALDI: So the investigation stopped in Washington, but continued in Chicago?

EDMONDS: Yes, and in 2000, another representative was added to the list, Jan Schakowsky, the Democratic congresswoman from Illinois. Turkish agents started gathering information on her, and they found out that she was bisexual. So a Turkish agent struck up a relationship with her. When Jan Schakowsky’s mother died, the Turkish woman went to the funeral, hoping to exploit her vulnerability. They later were intimate in Schakowsky’s townhouse, which had been set up with recording devices and hidden cameras. They needed Schakowsky and her husband Robert Creamer to perform certain illegal operational facilitations for them in Illinois. They already had Hastert, the mayor, and several other Illinois state senators involved. I don’t know if Congresswoman Schakowsky ever was actually blackmailed or did anything for the Turkish woman.

I think it would be wise to also concentrate on Rep. Jan Schakowsky’s convicted husband, Bob Creamer. After all, this is Chicago! The following is from what I wrote a while back titled ‘Chicago! Not the Musical, but the Action-Suspense Docudrama!’

Creamershak1In March 2004 Schakowsky's husband, lobbyist Robert Creamer, who was also executive director of the Illinois Public Action Fund, was indicted in federal court on 16 counts of bank fraud involving three alleged check-kitting schemes in the mid-1990s, leading several banks to experience shortfalls of at least $2.3 million. Later he pleaded guilty to tax violations and bank fraud for writing rubber checks and failing to collect withholding tax from an employee. Here is a report in USA Today:

Creamer, 58, a prominent Chicago political consultant, was accused of swindling nine financial institutions of at least $2.3 million while he ran a public interest group in the 1990s.Creamer told reporters Wednesday there was "no doubt that my actions a decade ago were very foolish and placed myself, my family, the organization and many of those who worked with me at considerable risk."The indictment alleged Creamer caused a series of insufficiently funded checks and wire transfers to be drawn on accounts he controlled as executive director of the Illinois Public Action Fund. According to the indictment, he allegedly then used the inflated balances to pay the group's expenses and own salary.

And here is more:

The husband of U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) will spend five months in prison for committing bank fraud as part of his efforts to keep afloat a nonprofit group that he ran. U.S. Senior District Judge James Moran handed down the punishment on Wednesday to Robert Creamer, who also will serve 11 months under house arrest.

The sentence fell far short of the three-year prison term that prosecutors were seeking for Creamer, who pleaded guilty last year to writing a series of bad checks worth millions of dollars to numerous banks to generate cash -- a scheme known as check-kiting.

Now, Rep. Schakowsky served on the organization's board during the time the crimes occurred. She happened to sign all the IRS filings along with her husband during this almost decade long of … basically embezzlements. She was fully aware of her husband’s additional income of $100,000 from these fraudulent funds. Yet, this woman, who happens to be a Representative, claimed she had no idea, that she had not noticed, that she had not known or suspected.

I don’t know about you but no matter under which one of the two scenarios - she didn’t know or she knew and went along - this woman should have been kicked out of her congressional seat. Let’s take the first scenario:

If she is so dumb and stupid as to sign all these joint IRS documents and it doesn’t register that there are unaccounted for millions of dollars, she is not competent to be a congresswoman. PERIOD! If she is so irresponsible and intelligence-wise challenged to serve on this organization’s board, sign all the minutes and papers and bank dealings, and yet doesn’t realize millions of dollars are coming out of nowhere, then she is not capable and mentally unfit to occupy her current congressional seat, and should be removed. PERIOD! So here is the question for Schakowsky’s constituents: If she is telling the truth shouldn’t they be voting this uber gullible, stupid woman out of office?

Under the second scenario that we assume she knew: she is a criminal, and she should have joined her husband in jail. She was an accomplice in swindling nine financial institutions of at least $2.3 million.

As for Robert Creamer’s connections, we’ve already established his connection to Blagojevich :

Jan Schakowsky contributed $28,000 to Blagojevich, endorsed him in 2002 and 2006, and raised money for his campaign through 2008. Her convicted felon husband Robert Creamer worked for Rod Blagojevich before pleading guilty to tax and bank fraud.

From 2001-2002, Friends of Blagojevich paid more than $541,000 to a political consulting firm run by Schakowsky’s husband, Robert Creamer, according to state records. The firm, Strategic Consulting Group, reportedly provided “consulting,” “field consulting” and “predictive dialer” services to the Blagojevich campaign.

Okay, you can read the entire piece on Chicago here

Come on proud Chicagoans. Isn’t it time to set things straight? Are you going to stand up, pick a ‘real candidate,’ and cast your vote with conscious? Or are you going to say ‘oh well, this is Chicago!’ ?!
 

# # # #

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by contributing directly and or purchasing Boiling Frogs showcased products.

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.

Comments

  1. Funny, I had talked about people that hold public office who have been a party to or have committed a crime, and how insane that is. Why should we as tax payers allow criminals to continue to collect a salary?

    And what’s with Chicagoan’s anyhow? Why isn’t someone stepping forward as a write-in since it’s apparent these two are serving interest’s outside of the U.S. more so than they are within?

    Thanx for keeping us informed!

  2. Backstory:
    Patrick Fitzgerald implicated by Peter Lance in the 9-11 coverup moved to Chicago as well.
    Israel reneges on the settlement freeze, and Gaza in Ha’aretz is alleged to have new missiles capable of striking Israeli jets and deep into Israel. They were supposedly brought in through tunnels from Egypt.
    In ‘Confessions of an Economic Hitman’, John Perkins admits to being seduced and recruited by a mysterious woman. Recently on a DVD of one of his talks, he admits that this woman worked for the NSA.

  3. Hi Sibel 🙂

    The pictures you are posting don’t seem to be loading all the way.

  4. Here it is, as expected, play the anti-semite card:

    “Your Anti-Semitism is foul and disgusting. You are blocked. Good riddance”

    well, somehow, when I write about Fethullah Gulen’s Madrasas & lobby in US, when I write about Jean Schmidt’s representation of Turkish Lobby, or, Dennis Hastert’s Turkish Foreign Agent status, no one, not a single soul, is screaming anti-Turkish or anti-Muslim. HmmmmmI wonder why?! Now that was a rhetorical question;-)

    Also, do you see any other candidates who come out and campaign on a platform that says I will represent Poland’s interest, or, China’s interest, or, Uganda’s interest? Imagine what they would face if they were to do just that. Somehow this doesn’t apply to those with first loyalty to Israel. Hmmmmmm. I wonder how that happened?! Again, rhetorical, ok?!

    I am going to go even further: those who represent Israel’s interest in US public offices, after taking the oath to represent this nation and its constitution, should be all convicted of treason. Period. I hope we’ll get to see that day. In our life time.

    Meanwhile, those of you who are attacking this piece and waving anti-semite flag, bring’m on. You are doing far more damage to the Jewish religion…

  5. Don’t worry Sibel…”those” are always out there. Keep telling it like it is! I too hope to see that day. Also the day that Palestine is given back to the Palestinians.

  6. ZicaTanka says:

    “Your Anti-Semitism is foul and disgusting. You are blocked. Good riddance”

    Where did you see this quote?

  7. @ Zica: the guy/person was one of my twitter followers; posted it there: http://twitter.com/sellitman

    @Timster: You bet! You see, there’s not much they can do to me because: I am not working or looking for a job in one of their many sectors (you know, think tanks, publishing houses, media outlets, their funded NGOs;-), I am laready on The MSM ‘censored’ list, I don’t hold an academic position to be taken away, I am not promoting a book or a movie… Too bad for them-not one of their usual targets;-)

  8. Kingfisher says:

    “And what’s with Chicagoan’s anyhow?”
    To be clear, the 9th district does have a large Jewish population.

    “Why isn’t someone stepping forward as a write-in since it’s apparent these two are serving interest’s outside of the U.S. more so than they are within?”
    It cuts both ways. For me, I find it hard to say that I am against supporting Israel at the expense of our national interests, and then go a support say, an Armenian Genocide Resolution in congress. I have to be consistent in my suspicion of interest groups.

    Well, the problem is that many who may be against Israel’s undue influence have interest groups of their own. So say a candidate did go against these two for serving foreign interest’s, and say he wins. What happens when he is up for re-election and he needs–say the Polish-American community’s vote–and they in turn want something that may be contrary to American interests – like something that would really piss-off Russia-what’s he gonna do?

    KF

  9. Kingfisher says:

    “Your Anti-Semitism is foul and disgusting. You are blocked. Good riddance”
    Wow, this guy must have very delicate sensibilities.
    I find it bizarre that it is easier to talk about this stuff with actual Israelis, than it is with American supporters of Israel.

    KF

  10. KF, I agree with being consistent in suspicion of interest groups, as I am too. What baffled me was that I have never heard any politician before actually make remarks before about any other countries. I have heard it said about supporting minorities, unions, etc. but never specific to a country.

    And, until recently I had never heard of members of the government hold dual citizenship and having it be allowed, and yet we have that today. The only ones that I am aware of are those with dual citizenship to Israel. I’m sure I have a lot to learn about all this, but it has piqued my interest and I continue to learn more every day thanx to people like Sibel

  11. Just declare publicly that you will NEVER commit suicide, stay out of small aircraft(and visit my site http://timster-howdarei.blogspot.com/ daily)…and you should survive to keep fighting the good fight.

  12. @KF: “I find it bizarre that it is easier to talk about this stuff with actual Israelis, than it is with American supporters of Israel.” Same experience. It is suffocating. Now, tomorrow my post is on Fethullah Gulen (as I’ve done before), and let’s see if any one is going to come forward and call me an anti-Muslim…
    @micwazoo: Rahm Emanuel, Abramowitz, Feith…and so many who’ve remained closeted.

    @Timster: Thanks, but I am not worthy for them to even bother. Look, they let us stay marginalized, censored by the MSM, and remain as this minute irate minority; almost neutralized. And you know what, that’s ok. As long as we steadily expand this minute irate minority club…It will be like that Lion & Mouse story, so let’s keep at it and bring in others;-)

  13. Will DO! Every day…

  14. Sibel hi, I think you left out Chertoff.

    @micwazoo: Rahm Emanuel, Abramowitz, Feith

  15. “The two-state solution is disappearing. If we cannot stop the settlements through the peace process, we have to go to the Security Council, the Human Rights Council and every international legal body.”
    Palestinian Authority

    The way I see it. There are good Jews and bad Jews. Jews are only historically linked to the nation of Israel. I am afraid to challenge a good Jew, and I don’t know how to discern a bad Jew. I am clear that the nation of Israel is a Zionist artifact as much the product of Khazars and Elites as it is any legitimate nation.

Speak Your Mind