Barack Obama: the World Establishment’s Uncle Tom Card in the Re-Colonization of Africa

The Right Man to Pacify ‘Crying Race’ while Terrorizing & Colonizing Africa

ObamaOnly three years under the Obama presidency and we have had several covert and overt wars in Africa with the sole purpose of the re-colonization of Africa and its rich oil-mineral resources, while posing under the guise of ‘humanitarian intervention.’ The overt war in Libya, a not so secret war in Somalia, establishing a base in Uganda, sending troops to chase the Lord’s Resistance Army rebel group in the Congo, quietly setting up a number of new bases in Ethiopia and the Seychelles … and the list goes on. Not to mention the number of bodies piling up on top of each other as the West sinks its teeth into the long-sought-after continent and its resources.

AfricaFeverMany have been writing about and analyzing Obama’s Africa Fever. You must admit the man has been acting very feverish. In fact, I’d say he’s been the most feverish president we’ve had when it comes to slicing, dicing, and re-colonizing Africa. Granted, he is not the only one with the fever. The French, Brits, and a couple of other Old Europe players have been feverish as well; they’ve been salivating at the idea of reviving their old glory days of empire and colonies. Yet, the most feverish, I’m talking mouth-foaming delirious fever, appears to be our president-Barack Obama. And oddly enough, there doesn’t seem to be much “crying race” and colonialism from the black communities here in the U.S. I say here in the US because the majority of blacks in Africa seem to recognize, resent and speak out on this Black Super Power President’s colonization crusade in their land:

You can still see Obama’s likeness around town these days, especially in the tourist areas. But for many Ghanaians, the honeymoon with Obama is over. And it started to go sour when the first warplanes strafed Benghazi and Tripoli, in a NATO effort to protect civilians from strongman Muammar Qaddafi.That was the Libya-intervention’s official purpose, anyway. But Ghanaians aren’t buying it. To many observers here, it looks like a grab for Libya’s oil riches; to others, it’s a nefarious Western plot to re-colonize Africa.

They know one when they see one. They recognize colonizers when they see colonizers and their actions. Then why don’t we hear a major outcry from the black communities in the United States? I can assure you that we’d have heard the outcry if a white president had supported, armed and directed militias and rebels who did the following

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia - The chairman of the African Union says Libyan rebels may be indiscriminately killing black people in Libya because they have confused innocent migrant workers with mercenaries.Chairman Jean Ping told reporters Monday that this is one of the reasons the AU is refusing to recognize Libya's rebel Transitional National Council as the country's interim government.

Please watch this (Obama’s Men, the rebels):

I repeat: Obama backed and directed rebels:

Reuters is reporting that President Obama has already signed off on a presidential "finding"--i.e. an order--authorizing covert U.S. support for Libyan rebels. The order, which Reuters says was given "within the last two to three weeks" is described by the news service as the "principal form of presidential directive used to authorize secret operations by the Central Intelligence Agency" and is typically "crafted to provide broad authorization for a range of potential U.S. government actions to support a particular covert objective."

And here are Obama-backed practices in Somalia:

As part of its expanding counterterrorism program in Somalia, the CIA also uses a secret prison buried in the basement of Somalia’s National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters, where prisoners suspected of being Shabab members or of having links to the group are held. Some of the prisoners have been snatched off the streets of Kenya and rendered by plane to Mogadishu. While the underground prison is officially run by the Somali NSA, US intelligence personnel pay the salaries of intelligence agents and also directly interrogate prisoners. The existence of both facilities and the CIA role was uncovered by The Nation during an extensive on-the-ground investigation in Mogadishu.

According to former detainees, the underground prison, which is staffed by Somali guards, consists of a long corridor lined with filthy small cells infested with bedbugs and mosquitoes. One said that when he arrived in February, he saw two white men wearing military boots, combat trousers, gray tucked-in shirts and black sunglasses. The former prisoners described the cells as windowless and the air thick, moist and disgusting. Prisoners, they said, are not allowed outside. Many have developed rashes and scratch themselves incessantly. Some have been detained for a year or more. According to one former prisoner, inmates who had been there for long periods would pace around constantly, while others leaned against walls rocking.

And there are other Obama regime orchestrated games in Africa - like this one in Uganda.  Or this one in Nigeria. Here are a few excerpts from a recent article by Dr. Motsoko Pheko on the role of now strongly Obama-backed and directed Africom in the re-colonization of Africa :

Africans have a painful history of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade, racism and colonialism by nations that claim to be ‘civilised’ but have behaviour that is contrary to civilisation. They dehumanised Africa’s people and saw nothing wrong with that. They have never shown any remorse for their inhuman deeds to Africans or offered any reparations for the colossal damage they inflicted on Africans. America’s persistence to impose Africom on Africa proves this beyond reasonable doubt.

Vice Admiral Moeller was the man President George W Bush entrusted with the mission of Africom. Moeller knew that mission in and out. At the United States’ Africa Command Conference held at Fort McNair on 18 February 2008, this American head of ‘Africom’ declared that, ‘Protecting the free flow of natural resources from Africa to the global market is one of Africom’s guiding principles.’

Admiral Moeller specifically cited ‘oil disruption’, ‘terrorism’ and the growing influence of China as a major challenge to United States’ interests in Africa. Africom is organised by the office of the Under-Secretary of Defence for Forces Transformation Resources and National Security Policy at the National Defence University Fort McNair, Washington D.C.

Africom serves the interests of the United States of America. Africa does not need ‘Africom. Africom is a jackal in sheep’s clothing. A jackal cannot be entrusted with the security and lives of sheep.

PuppetYou would think our black communities in the US would be up in arms in reaction to a black president taking the lead in the partition and re-colonization of Africa, while amassing piles of bodies daily. Isn’t this a betrayal of African Americans by a black man?

Don’t take me wrong. I don’t view Obama as black. I don’t view him as white. I didn’t view George Bush in any color either. Because when it comes to these establishment puppets there are no colors. These sold-out puppets are all translucent to me. I see right through them all.

On the other hand, I can’t help but wonder if this President’s appearance of racial color played a role in his selection by the puppet-running establishment. We know of their hunger for global dominance. We know of their salivating mouths over resource-rich Africa. We know their long-held desire to re-rule the African continent as colonies. Wouldn’t an American president who appears black outwardly make their job easier? The establishment can sit back and enjoy their puppet’s performance while holding the strings. How about the audience? Well, the recipients in Africa can see right through the puppet’s strings. They don’t have to see the puppeteers to know their presence and lead. After all, they’ve been there. They’ve been through it for centuries. And the puppet’s black appearance doesn’t mean a thing. The white men frequently use black men to take over other black men:

Europeans lacked the local knowledge to be able to negotiate the perils of the African interior, so they used middlemen for this task, according to Olaudah Equiano, who had himself been captured in this way. European slaving ships waited at coastal ports to pick up their cargoes of slaves. Middlemen would attack Africans working in the fields and march them to the coast. Children acting as lookouts for their parents might also be captured.

They recognize Barack Obama as the white power’s middle man. He is the puppet. He is translucent but appears black. He is Uncle Tom. And that may have been one of the criteria for his selection by the puppeteers in 2008: Let the black-appearing man take the lead in slicing, dicing, partitioning, burning …re-colonizing our African prize, and helping pacify the audience who would be ‘crying race’ otherwise.


This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVD .

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.


  1. blackcat says:

    Hi Sibel I have a question that you might be able to clarify. I just watched the documentary Uganda Rising and it went into Kony’s atrocities against the people of N. Uganda. The documentary briefly went into western influences fueling the fires of the countries divisions to gain control over leaders for ultimate control over the country and its resources. I guess my question is what really happened? Did Kony kill thousands and kidnap children,etc. I can see why people want to help places like Uganda but are their efforts used to create back doors to recolonization for the purpose of resource control by the western super powers, that’s what the common sense tells me is happening.Some clarity on the subject would be nice because some sights are not really saying what happened but that this Kony thing is just an excuse to get back into Africa, making light of the atrocities that Kony did partake in.

  2. I would agree that he was chosen to as the perfect way to divide and attack Africa – Hilary would never been able to accomplish this. How else could they silence the black communities and also get the perfect left cover for his attack on Libya, now Syria, and Kony in Uganda. He effectively destroyed the anti-war movement and was able to mobilize the ignorant left into supporting R2P and more war. What a sad and despicable so called “liberal” establishment we have calling for more war in Africa, Syria and beyond. Amy Goodman of Hypocrisy Now! and Pacifica should be shamed for their coverage of recent events. They are complicit in all of what is happening.

  3. Oddly enough, one of the areas where G.W.Bush got high marks – at least among the wonk types – was in his Africa policy, e.g. with programs to make AIDS medicines affordable. Perhaps this was part of a larger stratagem to soften up the continent – to “win hearts and minds” prior to the brute conquest. Likewise, the Libya policy under GWB was a brief period of relative warmth between the two countries in what had been a long period of animosity. Qaddafi had always held the Western powers under great suspicion of neo-colonial designs – particularly Britain, the US and Italy. But with the thawing of relations, he let his guard down, and the rest is history.

    I think you’re onto something about Obama’s selection by the puppeteers. I also think the ‘birthers’ are onto something. Put these two somethings together, and you have the perfect modus operandi for a conquest of Africa. The black face is the cover, and the threat to expose the birth certificate is the insurance in case the man behind the face should exert an independent will.

    And there is some evidence to suggest that this is what elements in the Bush administration and US & British intelligence were looking into in the primary season of 2008…

    Too many white Americans have simply turned off their critical faculties when evaluating this president simply because they fear they might be a racist if they do. I don’t think the same is quite the case with black Americans though, who based on experience are considerably more cynical when it comes to politics. Of course, you do have Al Sharpton on the one hand who refuses to say anything bad about Obama. But then you have Louis Farrakhan who went from calling him messaianic to a murderer.

  4. Eleutheran Agitator says:

    Well said again.. Sibel . I did not vote for “Obama” for the same concepts and facts ,you have quoted here. As a black Caribbean and naturalized American ,I was immune from the Americanized propaganda education of the Carnegie ,Rockefeller`s and Ford Foundation in the black American society that has produced the current dumbed -down mentality of most African-Americans/Blacks/Nergo`s or what ever sociologist wants to call “us’ these days.
    I am going to disagree with you on calling “Obama” an uncle tom ,it is too nice of a word for his actions in the conquest of Africa ; “House Nergo” is a far better term and it was coined on the plantations in the Caribbean ,central & south America ,the birth place of westernized slavery.
    I voted for Ms. Cynthia McKinney ,knowing that she did not have a “snowball chance in hell” to win the election ,but she had a spine ;something that President Obama does not.
    Malcolm X said it best in this video of the current state of “Black America” ,if there is such a thing anymore.

    Here are two articles that compliments yours. . The second article is Obama`s promotion and support of keeping blacks in America under & uneducated and controlled.

  5. Sabretache says:

    The title of this piece is priceless.

    A question follows: How many more Uncle Toms will emerge from Uncle Sam’s forays into the Dark Continent?

Speak Your Mind