That Most Charming of Couples: Nationalism and Hypocrisy

“Unlimited power in the hands of psychopaths- My own country truly scares me.”

By William Blum

It’s not easy being a flag-waving American nationalist. In addition to having to deal with the usual disillusion, anger, and scorn from around the world incited by Washington’s endless bombings and endless wars, the nationalist is assaulted by whistle blowers like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden, who have disclosed a steady stream of human-rights and civil-liberties scandals, atrocities, embarrassing lies, and embarrassing truths. Believers in “American exceptionalism” and “noble intentions” have been hard pressed to keep the rhetorical flag waving by the dawn’s early light and the twilight’s last gleaming.

That may explain the Washington Post story (July 20) headlined “U.S. asylum-seekers unhappy in Russia”, about Edward Snowden and his plan to perhaps seek asylum in Moscow. The article recounted the allegedly miserable times experienced in the Soviet Union by American expatriates and defectors like Lee Harvey Oswald, the two NSA employees of 1960 – William Martin and Bernon Mitchell – and several others. The Post’s propaganda equation apparently is: Dissatisfaction with life in Russia by an American equals a point in favor of the United States: “misplaced hopes of a glorious life in the worker’s paradise” … Oswald “was given work in an electronics factory in dreary Minsk, where the bright future eluded him” … reads the Post’s Cold War-clichéd rendition. Not much for anyone to get terribly excited about, but a defensive American nationalist is hard pressed these days to find much better.

At the same time TeamUSA scores points by publicizing present-day Russian violations of human rights and civil liberties, just as if the Cold War were still raging. “We call on the Russian government to cease its campaign of pressure against individuals and groups seeking to expose corruption, and to ensure that the universal human rights and fundamental freedoms of all of its citizens, including the freedoms of speech and assembly, are protected and respected,” said Jay Carney, the White House press secretary. 1

“Campaign of pressure against individuals and groups seeking to expose corruption” … hmmm … Did someone say “Edward Snowden”? Is round-the-clock surveillance of the citizenry not an example of corruption? Does the White House have no sense of shame? Or embarrassment? At all?

I long for a modern version of the Army-McCarthy hearings of 1954 at which Carney – or much better, Barack Obama himself – is spewing one lie and one sickening defense of his imperialist destruction after another. And the committee counsel (in the famous words of Joseph Welch) is finally moved to declare: “Sir, you’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?” The Congressional gallery burst into applause and this incident is widely marked as the beginning of the end of the McCarthy sickness.

US politicians and media personalities have criticized Snowden for fleeing abroad to release the classified documents he possessed. Why didn’t he remain in the US to defend his actions and face his punishment like a real man? they ask. Yes, the young man should have voluntarily subjected himself to solitary confinement, other tortures, life in prison, and possible execution if he wished to be taken seriously. Quel coward!

Why didn’t Snowden air his concerns through the proper NSA channels rather than leaking the documents, as a respectable whistleblower would do? This is the question James Bamford, generally regarded as America’s leading writer on the NSA, endeavored to answer, as follows:

I’ve interviewed many NSA whistleblowers, and the common denominator is that they felt ignored when attempting to bring illegal or unethical operations to the attention of higher-ranking officials. For example, William Binney and several other senior NSA staffers protested the agency’s domestic collection programs up the chain of command, and even attempted to bring the operations to the attention of the attorney general, but they were ignored. Only then did Binney speak publicly to me for an article in Wired magazine. In a Q&A on the Guardian Web Snowden cited Binney as an example of “how overly-harsh responses to public-interest whistle-blowing only escalate the scale, scope, and skill involved in future disclosures. Citizens with a conscience are not going to ignore wrong-doing simply because they’ll be destroyed for it: the conscience forbids it.”

And even when whistleblowers bring their concerns to the news media, the NSA usually denies that the activity is taking place. The agency denied Binney’s charges that it was obtaining all consumer metadata from Verizon and had access to virtually all Internet traffic. It was only when Snowden leaked the documents revealing the phone-log program and showing how PRISM works that the agency was forced to come clean. 2

“Every country in the world that is engaged in international affairs and national security undertakes lots of activities to protect its national security,” US Secretary of State John Kerry said recently. “All I know is that it is not unusual for lots of nations.” 3

Well, Mr. K, anti-semitism is not unusual; it can be found in every country. Why, then, does the world so strongly condemn Nazi Germany? Obviously, it’s a matter of degree, is it not? The magnitude of the US invasion of privacy puts it into a league all by itself.

Kerry goes out of his way to downplay the significance of what Snowden revealed. He’d have the world believe that it’s all just routine stuff amongst nations … “Move along, nothing to see here.” Yet the man is almost maniacal about punishing Snowden. On July 12, just hours after Venezuela agreed to provide Snowden with political asylum, Kerry personally called Venezuelan Foreign Minister Elias Jaua and reportedly threatened to ground any Venezuelan aircraft in America’s or any NATO country’s airspace if there is the slightest suspicion that Snowden is using the flight to get to Caracas. Closing all NATO member countries’ airspace to Venezuelan flights means avoiding 26 countries in Europe and two in North America. Under this scenario, Snowden would have to fly across the Pacific from Russia’s Far East instead of crossing the Atlantic.

The Secretary of State also promised to intensify the ongoing process of revoking US entry visas to Venezuelan officials and businessmen associated with the deceased President Hugo Chávez. Washington will also begin prosecuting prominent Venezuelan politicians on allegations of drug trafficking, money laundering and other criminal actions and Kerry specifically mentioned some names in his conversation with the Venezuelan Foreign Minister.

Kerry added that Washington is well aware of Venezuela’s dependence on the US when it comes to refined oil products. Despite being one of the world’s largest oil producers, Venezuela requires more petrol and oil products than it can produce, buying well over a million barrels of refined oil products from the United States every month. Kerry bluntly warned that fuel supplies would be halted if President Maduro continues to reach out to the fugitive NSA contractor. 4

Wow. Heavy. Unlimited power in the hands of psychopaths. My own country truly scares me.

And what country brags about its alleged freedoms more than the United States? And its alleged democracy? Its alleged civil rights and human rights? Its alleged “exceptionalism”? Its alleged everything? Given that, why should not the United States be held to the very highest of standards?

American hypocrisy in its foreign policy is manifested on a routine, virtually continual, basis. Here is President Obama speaking recently in South Africa about Nelson Mandela: “The struggle here against apartheid, for freedom; [Mandela’s] moral courage; this country’s historic transition to a free and democratic nation has been a personal inspiration to me. It has been an inspiration to the world – and it continues to be.” 5

How touching. But no mention – never any mention by any American leader – that the United States was directly responsible for sending Nelson Mandela to prison for 28 years. 6

And demanding Snowden’s extradition while, according to the Russian Interior Ministry, “Law agencies asked the US on many occasions to extradite wanted criminals through Interpol channels, but those requests were neither met nor even responded to.” Amongst the individuals requested are militant Islamic insurgents from Chechnya, given asylum in the United States. 7

Ecuador has had a similar experience with the US in asking for the extradition of several individuals accused of involvement in a coup attempt against President Rafael Correa. The most blatant example of this double standard is that of Luis Posada Carriles who masterminded the blowing up of a Cuban airline in 1976, killing 73 civilians. He has lived as a free man in Florida for many years even though his extradition has been requested by Venezuela. He’s but one of hundreds of anti-Castro and other Latin American terrorists who’ve been given haven in the United States over the years despite their being wanted in their home countries.

American officials can spout “American exceptionalism” every other day and commit crimes against humanity on intervening days. Year after year, decade after decade. But I think we can derive some satisfaction, and perhaps even hope, in that US foreign policy officials, as morally damaged as they must be, are not all so stupid that they don’t know they’re swimming in a sea of hypocrisy. Presented here are two examples:

In 2004 it was reported that “The State Department plans to delay the release of a human rights report that was due out today, partly because of sensitivities over the prison abuse scandal in Iraq, U.S. officials said. One official … said the release of the report, which describes actions taken by the U.S. government to encourage respect for human rights by other nations, could ‘make us look hypocritical’.” 8

And an example from 2007: Chester Crocker, a member of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion, and formerly Assistant Secretary of State, noted that “we have to be able to cope with the argument that the U.S. is inconsistent and hypocritical in its promotion of democracy around the world. That may be true.” 9

In these cases the government officials appear to be somewhat self-conscious about the prevailing hypocrisy. Other foreign policy notables seem to be rather proud.

Robert Kagan, author and long-time intellectual architect of an interventionism that seeks to impose a neo-conservative agenda upon the world, by any means necessary, has declared that the United States must refuse to abide by certain international conventions, like the international criminal court and the Kyoto accord on global warming. The US, he says, “must support arms control, but not always for itself. It must live by a double standard.” 10

And then we have Robert Cooper, a senior British diplomat who was an advisor to Prime Minister Tony Blair during the Iraq war. Cooper wrote:

The challenge to the postmodern world is to get used to the idea of double standards. Among ourselves, we operate on the basis of laws and open cooperative security. But when dealing with more old-fashioned kinds of states outside the postmodern continent of Europe, we need to revert to the rougher methods of an earlier era – force, pre-emptive attack, deception, whatever is necessary to deal with those who still live in the nineteenth century world of every state for itself. 11

His expression, “every state for itself”, can be better understood as any state not willing to accede to the agenda of the American Empire and the school bully’s best friend in London.

So there we have it. The double standard is in. The Golden Rule of “do unto others as you would have others do unto you” is out.

The imperial mafia, and their court intellectuals like Kagan and Cooper, have a difficult time selling their world vision on the basis of legal, moral, ethical or fairness standards. Thus it is that they simply decide that they’re not bound by such standards.

# # # #

William Blum, BFP contributing author and analyst, is an American, historian and critic of United States foreign policy. He is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military & CIA Interventions Since World War II. He has described his life’s mission as: “If not ending, at least slowing down the American Empire. At least injuring the beast. It’s causing so much suffering around the world.Mr. Blum can be reached through his website http://killinghope.org .

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVDs.

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.

Comments

  1. I’m glad you used the word psychopath. I hope more people begin to realize that this is not a pejorative term, but actually indicative of a set of traits, for example, a lack of a conscience or empathy (and thus a lack of a sense of guilt, shame, or personal responsibility) combined with highly deceitful, manipulative behavior, and a tendency toward risk taking and pursuit of power over others. My understanding is that the psychopath is essentially unreformable, and so the idea that people within the government recognize the hypocrisy of decrying human rights abuses while at the same time perpetuating them, perhaps should be read as a cold assessment of reality calling for heightened perception management, rather than any real sense of remorse. Thus the delay of releasing the report rather than the pursuit of actual reform/ transformation. There is no hope to be found in this observation, other than waking up to the depth of our problems so that we can actually confront them. The longer we wait, the more likely it will be that we descend further into environmental, economic, and social collapse.

    In his book Political Ponerology, which is essentially about psychopathic governments, what author Lobaczewski refers to as a pathocracy, the author mentions at one point that crop failure and starvation are hallmarks of rule by psychopaths. I would say given the pressures put on the food supply from GM crops, climate chaos, mass pollinator die off, wall street food commodity futures, inflation, and overall criminal destabilization of the economic system, (all of which participate in this psychopathic paradigm) we may well be on course to see this notion bear out. Given the mass starvation already occurring on our planet, the precedent which is already underway simply has to migrate back to its place of origin.

  2. ProudPrimate says:

    So great to read this level of clarity. Your encyclopedia of imperialism “Killing Hope” is on my shelf. In the Matrix, where shallow thinking is all-pervasive, one reads articles like the one you reference at the Washington Post.

    I couldn’t resist posting the following beneath that one:
    =======================================
    Ms. Lally is a bit short-sighted in comparing Snowden with Oswald. What happened to the part where Snowden un-defects back to the USA and is welcomed back, no questions asked?

    Oswald’s treason had a very palpable harmful effect, as Francis Gary Powers noted in his book “Operation Overflight: A Memoir of the U-2 Incident”. He was in no doubt that the Crypto clearance Marine radar specialist from Otsugi Airbase (U-2 monitoring station) had told the Kremlin everything he knew — AS HE PROMISED AT THE US EMBASSY IN MOSCOW UPON HIS DEFECTION — that led directly to the downing of the super-plane and dashing of hopes for the Eisenhower-Khrushchev peace talks (something the CIA hated the very thought of).

    And yet, Oswald was welcomed back without comment, enfolded in the waiting arms of George DeMohrenschildt, fiercely anti-Communist Byelorussian, and the White Russian community in Texas (his work done — at least for the moment — or so he thought. Until the day when he declared “Oh! So I’m the patsy!”)

    No comparable harm has been alleged for Snowden, at least not yet.

  3. HAL 9000 says:

    Well put, a great statement from Mr. Blum. Hypocrisy has become a prominent feature of Washington D.C. and its agents, both foreign and domestic.

  4. The Post article also appears to be an appeal to those sympathetic to America’s fondness of torture and extra-judicial punishment of whistle blowers, ala Bradley Manning’s drawn out pre-trial torture/confinement or the destruction of Thomas Drake’s financial life. The piece screams “you may have escaped America’s justice system, Snowden, but we can all rest assured that you’ll be holed up in substandard housing, doing manual labor under the watchful eye of Russian secret police.” There is a disturbing resonance with this apparent enjoyment that comes with predicting or inflicting suffering on an “enemy” with a recent alternet piece covering the Aspen Security Forum, in which John Aschcroft jokingly remarked that rather than spending time in indefinite detention, detainees might just “wish they were on the end of one of those [drone hellfire] missiles.”

    http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/shocking-extermination-fantasies-people-running-americas-empire-full-display#.UfH13ntUNPE.facebook

  5. NuffSaid says:

    This is off focus here I know – but I’m compelled to spit-it-out.
    It seems to me that in this orbiting, as yet a closed container we call earth, we bi-peds are completely dependent on the natural resources contained herein. The organized crime units called national government’s, exist to ensure that only the “right” people have access and distribution rights to those resources. So…if the masses of bi-peds were able to stand their ground to control and distribute those resources “appropriately”, I think that would begin to wrench apart the organized crime units.

    Oversimplification of what would require significant global solidarity, organization, and sacrifice. None the less, a worthy endeavor. A goal, a target, a dream.

  6. Rose Mary says:

    “Oswald “was given work in an electronics factory in dreary Minsk, where the bright future eluded him” ”

    Oswald was CIA himself, he was sent to Soviet to spy. When he came back they did not bother to interrogate him, what we should expect in case a high profile defector. That example is worth nothing. The point is to scare future whistleblowers. For those with money Moscow is nice enough, a bit like Las Vegas.

Speak Your Mind