Corbett Report- Who Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks?

James Corbett Reports: As we approach the 12th anniversary of 9/11, it is time for 9/11 truth to mature as a movement before it stagnates into insignificance. Either the movement will live up to its potential by naming names and identifying suspects in the crime, or it will become another JFK assassination investigation, doomed to spend half a century fighting pointless territorial battles while the real perpetrators walk free. Join us for this 9/11 anniversary edition of The Corbett Report as we ask the question and demand an answer: Who was really behind the attacks?

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.

Comments

  1. The usual list of suspects: Cheney, Rumsfelt, Juliano .. is presented. To be able to brings the perpetrators to justice we have to continue the investigation .. so hard proof can be presented against …? We don’t know yet. Who was behind the 9/11? Twelve years has passed and Corbett don’t know

    Simple logic

    1. Saudi intelligence is funding/controlling al Qaeda (confirmed fact)
    2. Most of the official hijackers involved were Saudis (confirmed fact)
    3. The 911 ringleaders were Westernized muslims, not jihadists like Bin Laden
    4. The Jeddah consulate(CIA operatives) issued Express visas to several hijackers (confirmed fact)
    5. MSM produced falsified live TV transmission 9/11 (confirmed fact)
    6. Bin Laden was not involved in 1993 bombing (confirmed fact). No proof of 911 involvement (he was treatet at US hospital months before 911 = kept alive)
    7. Close relation Bush/Bin Laden family
    ——————————————————————–
    Most of the hijackers were working for Saudi intelligence
    The Bush administration/CIA was highly compliant
    MSM was highly compliant, and that continue
    ——————————————————————–
    Then we have only one option left: A top level Zionist operation -> thousands were involved

  2. Mgrdichian says:

    Solid video for the 12th anniversary of 9/11, but I find Jame’s critique of the current state of the truth movement problematic, and would have suggested editing out everything up to the 6:04 mark (even though one would be throwing out a few motivational tidbits), and start the video where he begins what he does best — deep political analysis… with a twist, and let it run for the remaining 54 minutes. The “twelve-year-old” analogy is not particularly functional, nor accurate, really. For all intents and purposes, the movement got it’s first public face with the Jersey Girls, and they were anything but infants.

    The history of the 911 truth movement is complex and unique in many ways. IMO if anything is adolescent, it’s the undercurrent of criticism exhibited in this video and elsewhere on this site toward 9/11 controlled demolition activists. The true leaders of that portion of the movement are doing a fantastic job. They are scholarly. They are remaining faithful to their mission of speaking directly to scientific issues about which they can speak with authority, and they are experiencing continual growth and respect because of it. They are extremely disciplined in de-politicizing their issues and therefore attracting cross-political support. They are raising large sums of money to grow their efforts and have secured a small army of dedicated volunteers.

    IMO there is what I will call this myth that the “911truth Movement” has shifted all of it’s focus to CD, whereas I’ve observed that it’s the activists who have stayed with their grade-school physics and apolitical approach who have developed a formula for longevity and have demonstrable success with changing public opinion on 9/11. My experience shows me that those activists who prefer to focus on their areas of expertise in government, military, spies and foreign relations issues, have not been able to coalesce around any one actionable easily understood facet, and therefore don’t receive as much attention both outside and inside the movement. Most of the early spokespersons have dropped out, with Sibel being a rare exception.

    The CD crowd has found and is perfecting a formula that works well for the issues they understand and feel comfortable propagating. IMO they shouldn’t be criticized for that. If the “non-CD” crowd wants bigger results on their issues, they need to come up with their own formula that works for them. What I feel is being suggested is that the CD crowd needs to shift its focus, to which I say the CD crowd needs to continue what it’s doing and the non-CD crowd needs to grow its end. We don’t need to shift, we need to expand.

    As far as comparing 911T to the JFK assassination, one thing I sometimes ponder is that JFK assassination history is ripe with scores of murders and strange deaths of people who tried to talk and tell the truth, whereas the 9/11 aftermath has seen very few. As much as that might indicate we are not touching the right nerves, I’m glad for the few lives we have saved and pray that people still alive with important information find discreet ways to get the truth out. And I disagree with the context James presented regarding the single bullet. Being old enough to have lived through the entire JFK assassination history, it could easily be argued that people like Cyral Wect

    My “alternate universe” thinking suggests it’s part and parcel of the first real (albeit internally) bloodless revolution we’re creating.

    Good to see Kevin Ryan given some solid airtime. I think it’s a first for BFP. IMO long overdue.

  3. Mgrdichian says:

    oops, got cut off

    Being old enough to have lived through the entire JFK assassination history, it could easily be argued that people like Cyril Wecht and the single bullet crowd kept the JFK issue from slipping into oblivion.

  4. Very good comment, Mgrdichian

  5. “A top level Zionist operation”. That is a hypothesis. It can be investigated as any other hypothesis. An teeager will understand that case

    In no way something like “NPAC”, “Neocons”, “CIA”, “KGB” or “Israel” will be able to organize something as big as 911, not to mention some “individuals”. CIA or Mossad do not run US administration or US media.

    Main perpetrator
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Sheikh_Mohammed
    is linked to intelligence, not Bin Laden. Still not convicted after 12 years .. because he is too dangerous to be put into court?
    Main perpetrator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Omar_Saeed_Sheikh
    “.. is a British-born terrorist of Pakistani descent with links to various Islamist militant organisations, including Jaish-e-Mohammed, al-Qaeda, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and the Taliban.”
    He is linked to MI6/ISI and is still free. Why? These perpetrators were working for intelligence, not Bin Laden. The official is not factual, but fiction. Piece of cake to prove that.

    Which intelligence? Some intelligence that does not exist in Corbett’s “world”.

  6. 911 researcher Robert Parry
    http://www.consortiumnews.com/2011/011511.html
    “Similarly, the structure of the Twin Towers, with interlocking beams allowing them to have height without the weight of older skyscrapers, would have produced the falling in on itself effect once the beams were weakened by the impact of the planes and the heat from the fires.

    However, since the events of 9/11 were unique – i.e. no one had tested flying fuel-laden passenger jets into buildings identical to the Twin Towers or the Pentagon – it is impossible to assess the various factors with 100 percent certainty. Thus, under the rules of the “truther” parlor game, the official analysis must be dismissed and a contrary analysis – however implausible – must be taken seriously.

    On other points, the “truthers” have simply stretched the truth. For example, one “truther” claim was that they had discovered a residue of explosive thermite in the World Trade Center wreckage. However, when I checked their source, I saw that the claim was actually that the residue was consistent with thermite, not that it was thermite.”

    This makes little sense to me. Robert Parry is supported by Kelvin Ryan

    🙁

  7. “Similarly, the structure of the Twin Towers, with interlocking beams allowing them to have height without the weight of older skyscrapers, would have produced the falling in on itself effect once the beams were weakened by the impact of the planes and the heat from the fires.”

    A “pancake fall” will not create enough speed for a fall in 12 second or less. This is more like the official version
    🙁

  8. Rose Mary: “I saw that the claim was actually that the residue was consistent with thermite, not that it was thermite.”

    If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, walks like a duck……….

    It’s not a stretch at all when analyzing empirical data, which is what they did, unlike trying to prove your “top level Zionist” claim, which is not as readily verifiable.

    We can let the readers decide which between scientific verification of a nanothermite signature in WTC dust, and your top level Zionist accusation, does more to accurately unravel the 9/11 lies the world’s been force fed.

  9. It is easy. The media is lying, sensoring, making rules like: No 911-conspiracy theory in our paper

    They would not do that unless to hide facts.

    Falsification in media is something we will exclude from our research -> not a real “truther” (Fintan Dunne was one of those)

  10. “… which is not as readily verifiable”

    There is no way to know who is a Zionist? (Zionism is assumed to be an “ideology”. That will be a misunderstanding of meaning. Then you “conclude” upon a misunderstanding.

  11. Wikipedia on 911: “Suspicion quickly fell on al-Qaeda. Although the group’s leader, Osama bin Laden, initially denied any involvement, in 2004 he claimed responsibility for the attacks.[1]”

    Bin Laden was an operative leader 2001 and had soldiers (false). Bin Laden claimed any responsibility (false). Bin Laden was alive 2004 (false)

    (All in one sentence) The falsifying Wikipedia

    When US planes bombed Bora Bora they bombed nothing. They did not want to capture Bin Laden. They cancelled the search, but pretended he was alive. Lie on lie.
    That tells us the war on al Qaeda was fiction.

    Who are these falsifiers? There is only one answer, those who have that power and money, the Zionists.

  12. I, for one, think that Sibel’s Gladio Plan B Series, done with Corbett, would be the very best non-CD evidence to rally around and focus on. It is complex, but work could be done to make it more digestible. Maybe an abridged video could help.

    I thought that Corbett mentioned someone doing an outline of it, but I haven’t checked it out yet. A mind map I think, which would be great. I think he said it was AmericanJudas.blogspot.com, but I need to confirm.

    One of the reasons that this focus on Gladio Plan B, regarding 9/11, would be useful, is that it is also useful for current events, so you’re tapping into the main vein of what is still going on and not only something that already happened. This also makes it the most likely area of exposure to stop the next attack.

    I want to add that I’ve recently been reminded that 9/11 is still the backstop and the reason that many, a couple neighbors of mine for instance, are rolling over about the NSA crimes. So, it needs to be addressed.

  13. I never learned Bin Laden promoted suicide bombing. The originator of al Qaeda was Brzezinski (zionist). He was supported by Saudi money for sure. After the Afghan war the Jihadist cause evaporated, but al Qaeda continued. In the nineties they operated in Jugoslavia funded by Saudi charities and drug trafficing. They were transported by Victor Bout’s company (a zionist) into a CIA airport (more zionists, they work together) outside UN control.

    Now al Qaeda was a mercenary army, very active in Chechnya. What interest has Chechnya to Saudi-Arabia? No, Sunnies are suppose to fight Shias, like Iran. But as a zionist army al Qaeda was used for everything, including terror in Russia and Chechnya.

    Will mercenaries commit suicide for money? Of course not. So why all those “sucide bombs” against Shias in Iraq? That is a myth, a “sucide bomb” is mostly a bomb planted on someone else and remotely detonated. But MSM cultivate this “sucide bombers” and “Jihadists” myth every day.

    al Qaeda are not “suicide bombers” or “Jihadists”, they are terrorists.

    The 911 hijackers were “suicide bombers”?

    There were no pilots in the planes, they were remotely controlled. MSM and 911 Commision are lying all the way. That confirms what we all suspected, MSM is conspiring against us. MSM is also zionists.

    911 solved. The details remains

  14. 84% don’t trust the official version
    RT now promotes 911-truth. Sibel is used as it truth witness!!!

  15. The thing about this physical reality we experience, is that scale makes a difference, though it often seems counter-intuitive. For example, how many ordinary people would assume a sphere’s ratio of surface area to volume remains constant as size increases? Need I say it does not, not even close?

    Big boxy skyscrapers are inherently different from smaller pointy skyscrapers, because the ratio of internal volume and mass to external surface area, is much, much higher. A building comparable to the Trade Center buildings had never fallen down before, therefore we have no point of reference at accurate scale. One thing we know for sure, however, is the mass of the floors above the initial fail points was enormous beyond all precedent.

    If only one floor could be made to collapse, the downward kinetic energy plus massive weight of the floors above, guaranteed a total collapse. Absolutely, positively. There is no need for CD throughout the entire building, top to bottom. I’m not saying it positively was not done, but if it was done, it was superfluous.

    The fact that not one of the four data recorders was officially recovered, which is unprecedented for a airliner crash not at sea, is the smoking gun which tells us the planes impacting the towers were not the planes carrying the passengers. Faking the data on those kinds of recorders and then disabling them prior to flight without subsequent post-crash detection of faking and tampering would have been an enormous technical challenge. The only practical solution to that problem was to not recover any data recorders.

    The planes which hit the towers were more likely remote-controlled flying demolition packages, loaded with extra fuel and juiced-up thermite. There may have been additional thermite seeded along the central column, probably at multiple points since the exact point of impact could probably not be predicted. No detonation wiring would have been required because the fire from the planes would have set it off. We know the second plane appeared to miss center mass yet that tower fell first, so it’s reasonable to theorize extra thermite was in place to guarantee failure of the central columns, and the fire distribution from the off-center hit may have gotten more thermite burning quicker.

    I’m getting old but I would like to live long enough to know the fate of Flight 11 and Flight 175, planes and passengers. Somebody knows, and the season for letting truth out is now.

    • Whipping Boy says:

      That doesn’t explain the lower levels under the impact zones going into dust, pieces of the towers being pushed out like projectiles into the surrounding wtc buildings from the impact zones to the top “undamaged” floors. These parts go off like arrows from a bow, as the levels below the impact zone turn to MICROSCOPIC DUST. Thermite can’t do that.

  16. Any opinion about MSM being complicit?

  17. Xicha,

    Yes please do an abridged version of Gladio B. Because I tried to follow the information here on it and it kind of blew my mind –and I don’t consider myself particularly stupid either, but I could be wrong.

    -A

  18. Knarf says

    “If only one floor could be made to collapse, the downward kinetic energy plus massive weight of the floors above, guaranteed a total collapse.”

    That’s bullshit, and anyone who knows the physics of collisions at the high school level, knows that’s bullshit.

  19. We only need to apply two laws to decide (with enough accuracy) WTC falls were not pancake collapses.

    First time I discussed 911 with a skeptics he immediately claimed the fall lasted “17 seconds”. Why would he state something like that without any evidence? I could not understand why. Later I undestood: SKEPTICS are ZIONISTS. They will deny any false flag operation in history.

  20. Hal,

    20,000 tons accelerating at 32 ft/sec/sec for the height of one floor generates an order of magnitude more force than required to destroy the next floor down. You don’t have to destroy the entire building at once with your falling mass, you just have to destroy the next floor down. And then the next, and the next…

    If a demolition company had been contracted to bring down these buildings, the end result would have been considered a massive screw-up. Neighboring structures were severely damaged, and a lot of steel several stories high was left standing. An infamous photo which I believe Alex Jones presented as evidence of thermite slicing through a huge beam at an angle, was actually taken during demolition. The beam was cut at angle with a huge torch to bring down many tons of steel it was still supporting. That column would have been cut in the basement if CD was done.

    In CD, you start the collapse from the bottom, so that literally nothing is left standing. We all saw where the collapses started, very high on the buildings. Because of the sheer scale and immense mass, the buildings were quite effectively destroyed one floor at a time top down, but not nearly as neatly as would have been done with CD.

    CD is not needed to explain the collapse, so it should be thrown out. Period. No BS.

  21. You make it sound like that top section should have been found in tact after it destroyed the bottom, floor by floor. We saw, instead, the top section disappear as it was, itself, destroyed. We did not see any jolts as it impacted the bottom section.

    What about the top section that can be seen tipping at an angle? Why didn’t it fall off? I think I heard an explanation for that, having something to do with rotation, buy I can’t remember.

  22. knarf
    “20,000 tons accelerating at 32 ft/sec/sec for the height of one floor generates an order of magnitude more force than required to destroy the next floor down. You don’t have to destroy the entire building at once with your falling mass, you just have to destroy the next floor down. And then the next, and the next… ”

    That possibility was what contruction engineers could eliminate by few days .. some even at first sight. Seriously, don’t expect be be taken seriously on other subjects …
    🙁

  23. “CD is not needed to explain the collapse, so it should be thrown out. Period. No BS.”

    CD is the only explanation that has been offered which both fits the evidence and conforms to fundamental laws of physics.

Speak Your Mind