Putin Steps into World Leadership Role

“The Squealing Stuck Pigs Include Human Rights Watch Bloggers Who Seem to be Financed Out of the CIA’s Back Pocket.”

Putin’s article in the September 11 New York Times has the stuck pigs squealing. The squealing stuck pigs are just who you thought they would be–all those whose agendas and profits would be furthered by an attack on Syria by the obama Stasi regime.

Included among the squealing stuck pigs are Human Rights Watch bloggers who seem to be financed out of the CIA’s back pocket.

Does any institution remain that has not been corrupted by Washington’s money?

Notice that the reason Putin is being criticized is that he has blocked the obama regime from attacking Syria and slaughtering countless numbers of Syrians in the name of human rights. The stuck pigs are outraged that obama’s war has been blocked. They were so much looking forward to the mass slaughter that they believe would advance their profits and agendas.

Most of Putin’s critics are too intellectually challenged to comprehend that Putin’s brilliant and humane article has left Putin the leader of the free world and defender of the rule of law and exposed obama for what he is–the leader of a rogue, lawless, unaccountable government committed to lies and war crimes.

Putin, being diplomatic, was very careful in his criticism of obama’s September 10 speech in which obama sought to justify Washington’s lawlessness in terms of “American exceptionalism.” Obama, attempting to lift his criminal regime by the bootstraps up into the moral heavens, claimed that United States government policy is “what makes America different. It’s what makes us exceptional.”

What obama told Americans is exactly what Hitler told the Germans. The Russians, having borne more than anyone else the full weight of the German war machine, know how dangerous it is to encourage people to think of themselves as exceptional, unbound by law, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Security Council, and humane concerns for others. Putin reminded obama that “God created us equal.”

If Putin had wanted to give obama the full rebuke that obama deserves, Putin could have said: “obama is correct that the policy of the US government is what makes the US exceptional. The US is the only country in the world that has attacked 8 countries in 12 years, murdering and dispossessing millions of Muslims all on the basis of lies. This is not an exceptionalism of which to be proud.”

Putin is obviously more than a match for the immoral, low grade morons that Americans put into high office. However, Putin should not underestimate the mendacity of his enemies in Washington. Putin warned that the militants that Washington is breeding in the Middle East are an issue of deep concern. When these militants return to their own countries, they spread destabilization, as when extremists used by the US in the overthrow of Libya moved on to Mali.

The destabilization of other countries is precisely the main aim of Washington’s wars in the Middle East. Washington intends for radicalization of Muslims to spread strife into the Muslim populations of Russia and China. Washington’s propaganda machine will then turn these terrorists into “freedom fighters against oppressive Russian and Chinese governments,” and use Human Rights Watch and other organizations that Washington has penetrated and corrupted to denounce Russia and China for committing war crimes against freedom fighters. No doubt, chemical weapons attacks will be orchestrated, just as they have been in Syria.

If Washington’s NATO puppet states wake up in time, the warmongers in Washington can be isolated, and humanity could be spared WWIII.

# # # #

Paul Craig Roberts, Boiling Frogs Post contributing author, is a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has been reporting on executive branch and cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. He has written or co-written eight books, contributed chapters to numerous books, and has published many articles in journals of scholarship. Mr. Roberts has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy, and has been a critic of both Democratic and Republican administrations. You can visit his website here.

© PaulCraigRoberts.org

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVDs.

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.

Comments

  1. peasantparty says:

    I used to think that Webster Parkley and Greg Palast were whackos. I believe them more than ever now.

    Parkley was right about the war mongers on both the Republican and Democrat sides. It is what the elites want no matter what, and to be an elite you have to be in the top echelon of Banking or War Machinery. Together with oil and gas criminals, the council on foreign relations, PNAC, and NWO freaks want to control the entire globe.

  2. Excellent- it’s high time someone put the US in it’s place. Sadly it took 8 countries in 12 years and a bloodbath of lies to do so.

  3. Maryanne224 says:

    Thank you for this article.

  4. I thought I would post a segment from JFK’s June 10, 1963 Commencement Address at American University. It appears that in the last few days the shoe is on the other foot. The irony is deafening:

    ‘And second, let us reexamine our attitude towards the Soviet Union. It is discouraging to think that their leaders may actually believe what their propagandists write. It is discouraging to read a recent, authoritative Soviet text on military strategy and find, on page after page, wholly baseless and incredible claims, such as the allegation that American imperialist circles are preparing to unleash different types of war, that there is a very real threat of a preventive war being unleashed by American imperialists against the Soviet Union, and that the political aims — and I quote — “of the American imperialists are to enslave economically and politically the European and other capitalist countries and to achieve world domination by means of aggressive war.”

    Truly, as it was written long ago: “The wicked flee when no man pursueth.”

    Yet it is sad to read these Soviet statements, to realize the extent of the gulf between us. But it is also a warning, a warning to the American people not to fall into the same trap as the Soviets, not to see only a distorted and desperate view of the other side, not to see conflict as inevitable, accommodation as impossible, and communication as nothing more than an exchange of threats.’

  5. “… to be an elite you have to be in the top echelon of Banking or War Machinery”

    Not exactly

    Thomas Drake (NSA) is good looking, firm voice, shows statemanship, and is highly dedicated to work.

    As we understand that is not good enough to avoid being fired. On the other hand, other people can be vice president without any talent. The secret is in “other”.

  6. The case of Elizabeth O’bagy

    “O’Bagy also served as the political director of the Syria Emergency Task Force (SETF), a Syrian rebel advocacy group that has lobbied the White House and Congress to lend support to opposition groups.
    She also resisted the Obama administration’s decision to deem al-Nusra a terror organization in December.
    “I’m not saying they aren’t a terrorist group,” she told McClatchy last year. “But given the circumstances and given their disastrous cooperation with the opposition as a whole, designating them now would be disastrous.”
    Kerry said the op-ed was a “very interesting article” and remarked on O’Bagy’s “enormous” experience, including learning Arabic.
    A lot of people were quite shocked when a 26-year-old Ph.D, so-called Syria expert who appeared to have never worked in the region, and whom no one had heard of, appeared on CNN and other networks as a Syrian expert.””

    http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/09/who-funds-syrian-rebel-advocate-obagy-and-the-syrian-emergency-task-force-you-do/
    “State Department contracting firms like “ARK [Access Resources Knowledge], Chemonics, Creative [Associates International]—a number of the big contractors” set up the contracts and pay the Syrian Emergency Task Force, O’Bagy told TheDC.

    With each contract, O’Bagy made more money. This revelation raises serious questions about her incentives to support American involvement in Syria. Both Secretary of State John Kerry and Senator John McCain cited O’Bagy’s work in the push for military action but did not disclose her ties to the rebel groups.”

    http://mondoweiss.net/2013/09/shady-pr-operatives-pro-israel-ties-anti-castro-money-inside-the-syrian-oppositions-dc-spin-machine.html
    “Unfazed by the sarcastic aside, the activist told me about meetings at WINEP and entreaties to AIPAC. He mentioned Radwan Ziadeh, director of the Syrian Center for Political & Strategic Studies, as a key emissary between SETF and pro-Israel lobbyists.

    Ziadeh appeared at the American Jewish Committee’s 2011 Global Forum to make the case for Western intervention in Syria. Ziadeh was among the self-proclaimed “foreign policy experts” who signed an August 27 open letter to Obama calling for military intervention in Syria. Other “experts” lending their names to the letter included Karl Rove, Elliot Abrams, Governor Tim Pawlenty, and veteran anti-abortion activist Gary Bauer”.
    ——–

    Elizabeth O’bagy got instant celebrity status in MSM. Why?

  7. Excuse me if I have some reservations about former KGB Lieutenant Colonel Vladimir Putin. He’s a politician now, and knows the right things to say.

    God created us equal, but we created countries. And we created the game of chess, a form of which is being played now in Syria and Iran. It’s the kind that’s pretty rough on the pawns. Putin considers himself a grand master.

    That Putin is able to make the current crop of Washington DC stick-up-the-ass clowns look pathetic, is indeed entertaining, certainly to him. Anyone with half a brain and access to the world’s ear could do the same. It’s like shooting ducks in a barrel.

    Does Roberts seriously believe Putin prioritizes morality ahead of exploiting this situation for his own aggrandizement?

    Ask Litvinenko about Putin. Oh wait…you can’t…

    Leader of the Free World? Where in the heck is there a Free World?

  8. Today it is not Russians boots crashing front door Americans need to fear, but a FED paid SWAT team – to make sure you are obeying the laws and not growing organic food… “Watch your neighbors – Anything suspious”?

  9. “Does any institution remain that has not been corrupted by Washington’s money?”

    It is so obvious, unless you are a Zionist you will not be an Obama advisor. That makes Obama the same. Americans voted for peace first time (last time the choice was 1. War 2. War). What they got was a warmongerer.

  10. More on ELIZABETH O’BAGY:
    http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/09/14/kerry-and-mccains-fake-phd-syria-expert-obagy-is-neocon-and-israeli-linked-operative/

    Her appearance as all-American-girl
    http://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/thumbnails/i/082613/0/0/082613_sr_OBAGY_640.jpg

    Her name tells us she is Irish-American
    But: “.. a “senior research analyst” at Washington’s heavily pro-Israeli and neoconservative think tank, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), ”
    .. she too is a Zionist.

    This all-American-girl is a Caucasian. We are tought “zionism” is about American-Israelis or Jewish-Americans. Not true.

  11. ‘And second, let us reexamine our attitude towards the Soviet Union. It is discouraging to think that their leaders may actually believe what their propagandists write. It is discouraging to read a recent, authoritative Soviet text on military strategy and find, on page after page, wholly baseless and incredible claims, such as the allegation that American imperialist circles are preparing to unleash different types of war, that there is a very real threat of a preventive war being unleashed by American imperialists against the Soviet Union, and that the political aims — and I quote — “of the American imperialists are to enslave economically and politically the European and other capitalist countries and to achieve world domination by means of aggressive war.”

    This “propaganda” which the Soviets believed was true then, and it is truer now. Kennedy did not think this was what the United States should be, tried to stop these “American imperialist circles” and was assassinated for his efforts. We have not had anything like a real president since, just puppets manipulated by those same circles.

  12. I agree, Tony. Kennedy twice had to sit in on briefings with members of the JCS who had a plan for preemptive nuclear strike on the Soviet Union. There were “some” within the military/intelligence and State Department who felt that the United States with a 17 to 1 nuclear advantage over the Soviets during this time should strike. JFK was terrified by this prospect when he uttered these words: “…And they call us the human race.” Furthermore, the pundits who criticized JFK over the lack of air cover on the Bay of Pigs, which was to be an overt act after the covert strike was sabotaged, failed to understand that the Soviets would launch a massive ground invasion of Berlin. NATO’s only response because of the lack of manpower to defend Berlin and western Europe was to use “tactical” nuclear weapons.

  13. To defeat Berlin they would only have to shut it off.

  14. Yes, in fact it was the called the Berlin airlift at one point. Berlin was a chess piece which Kennedy knew was leveraged by the Soviets if the U.S. invaded Cuba. Again, NATO’s only response against a Soviet invasion of Berlin would have been to use nuclear weapons. Moreover, what came out through the JFK records Act after 1998 was the Soviets already had in place in Cuba tactical nuclear weapons, ready to be launch, against a U.S. land invasion of Cuba. Also, this is where we learned about Operation Northwoods which James Bamford first printed in his book – “Body of Secrets.”

  15. “NATO’s only response against a Soviet invasion of Berlin would have been to use nuclear weapons.”

    Without outside supplies people in Berlin would have to flee. Why spend soldiers for that?

    At the time of Cuba crises NATO had put nuclear weapons into Tyrkey. Soviet did not like that and responded. Soviet was surrounded by US bases. We thought it was opposite, that West was on the brink of being overrun.

  16. This is not about spending of soldiers. It was about a nuclear first strike against the what the hawks called “evil” – The Soviet Union. And the hawks wanted to do just that with a 17 to 1 nuclear superiority. Furthermore, Berlin was the centerpiece for such a confrontation going back to the Berlin airlift of 1948.

    Here is an extract form James Douglass’ book – JFK And The Unspeakable, page 113 to give an idea of the mindset relative to nuclear weapons, Cuba and most of all Berlin:

    ‘…His attitude toward the president’s order that he withdraw U.S. tanks from the wall anticipated the Joint Chiefs’ anger a year later at their commander-in-chief’s pledge not to invade Cuba. Two and a half weeks after the tanks confrontation that threatened a nuclear holocaust, its instigator, Lucius Clay, sent a telegram to Secretary of State Dean Rusk in which he stated:

    “Today, we have the nuclear strength to assure victory at awful cost. It no longer suffices to consider our strength as a deterrent only and to plan to use it only in retaliation. No ground probes on the highway which would use force should or could be undertaken unless we are prepared instantly to follow them with a nuclear strike. It is certain that within two or more years retaliatory power will be useless as whoever strikes first will strike last.”‘

    Berlin was the proving ground to both the U.S. and Soviet forces and the sine qua non to nuclear ambitions by the hawks within the pentagon.

  17. Knarf,

    Yes I do seriously believe that Putin and Russia is a force for humanity and also the truest ally of the United States in this situation in which our government has been hijacked by an imperialist war party. Putin is upholding international law against an aggressive imperial power. Sure it’s in his interest to do so. It is also in the interest of all rational human beings. Without international law we are all dead.

  18. “… the hawks within the pentagon.”

    Major “hawk” Curtis LeMay (General Buck Turgison in Dr. Strangelove)

    http://jewishcurrents.org/tag/curtis-lemay
    “Air Force General Curtis LeMay later boasted that ‘we burned down every town in North Korea,’ and that he grounded his bombers only when there were no more targets to hit anywhere north of the 38th parallel. Pyongyang was an ashen moonscape. ”

    http://rense.com/general89/atroc.htm
    “It is also this same cabal that wants the US and/or Israel to destroy Iran with nuclear bombs, in its march toward utter destruction and chaos in the Middle East.”

    “same cabal” -> Zionism

  19. Even Curtis LeMay was weary of the one hawk who took us to DEFCON 2 without the JFK’s approval or if I am correct without LeMay’s permission too – Thomas Powers SAC commander.

  20. Reading about Curtis LeMay he seems to be a true terrorist
    I associate him with “Knights Templar” (those kind of people the Muslims did not want as slaves, they just beheaded them) not because of his biography, but by looking at his behavior.

  21. Parallell in history! The Knight Templars were finally defeated by Muslims not far from Damascus?

  22. I agree with Knarf. Kudos to Putin for saying the right thing at the right time and making the war machine work harder to achieve its goals, but let’s not confuse the man with Gandhi.

  23. “Kudos to Putin for saying the right thing at the right time and making the war machine work harder to achieve its goals, ..”

    You meant preparing a WWIII?

  24. John,

    Nobody is perfect, not Gandhi and not Putin. But Putin is a strong and competent leader who is acting in the interest of his country to uphold the principles of international law without which we will all be dead. Lately the United States has behaved in a manner highly reminiscent of Hitler’s drive for a “thousand-year Reich”. I do not see how Putin could do a better job of containing this dangerous power while giving the American people time to get rid of the fascists in control of our foreign policy. My hat is off to him.

  25. metrobusman says:

    Those who are imperceptive enough to believe that Putin is anything other than a thug should watch this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuJmb3kLE5U

    And they should remember Beslan, Anya Politkovskaya, Smolensk et alia.

Speak Your Mind