Spiro Reports-“Too Big to Jail”: The Revolving Doors- From HSBC to the Clintons

The Revolving Doors between governments and corporations go way beyond conflicts of interest. A criminal network exists that is subverting the judicial system, ensuring business as usual for the elite. Let’s take a look at a great recent example of this phenomenon in the case of Hillary Clinton and HSBC, and their gate-keepers, from FBI’s James Comey and DOJ’s Loretta Lynch, to former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Henry Kissinger!

*Follow us here at Newsbud Twitter

**Subscribe here at BFP-Newsbud YouTube Channel

Show Notes

“Too Big To Jail” — Us Refuses To Charge Hsbc Because It Could Hurt The Financial System

Report Prepared by the Republican Staff of the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives 

Anonymous FBI Agents Say Lynch and Clinton Struck a Deal on That Plane

HSBC Hires Kissinger to Help Them Flee The Country

HSBC Seeks Rice Advice As HQ Decision Looms

HSBC money laundering report: Key findings

Gangster Bankers Too Big To Fail

Black Dossier: HSBC and Terrorist Finance

US Refused To Prosecute HSBC Over Fears Of "Global Financial Disaster"

Former MI5 Chief Jonathan Evans Joins HSBC Main Board 

FBI Director Comey is a board member of Clinton Foundation connected bank HSBC.

Base wary of Clinton Foundation's ties to troubled banks

FBI Director Comey was board member of HSBC – Clinton Foundation & Drug Cartel ‘bank of choice’

HSBC To Be Fined Billions, Laundered Money For 9/11 Attacks

Report Shows How HSBC Maintained Its Ties With One Of Osama Bin Laden's Key Benefactors

Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie

Attorney General Lynch On Secret Meeting With Bill Clinton

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.

Comments

  1. Mgrdichian says:

    Top notch reporting

    Comment: when talking about the research avoid using editorialized terms like “Clinton crime family.” IMO it declares your research is biased. The old journalistic tradition of separating news from opinion is still a good one.

    Question: How do we know FBI agents are speaking anonymously? You made the statement but backed it up with nothing. You have to back it up with something.

    But altogether it was an excellent and timely podcast.

Speak Your Mind