The Rockefellers and Rothschilds in China: A Long, Intimate Relationship

The history of Wall Street and Anglo-American finance in China is one that is rarely discussed in western media or even academia, whereas knowing it would explain much about both China’s stunning economic rise over the past 70 years, as well as certainly seemingly rising tensions between China and the US today.  It’s hard to tell if there is genuine tension and enmity because of credible rivalry status between the US and China, or if everything is proceeding according to wider, deeper, much longer-term planning based on desired, durable and thus political coordination.  Large US, UK and EU investment banks are new entrants into China’s nascent bond sector, yet also retain longstanding presences pertaining to China’s financial and economic development.  Such factors should be weighed alongside other historical details in evaluating China’s recent threats to ‘dump US Treasury bonds’, as well as to ultimately view any sense of symbiosis which the US and China are serving, and why.  Are banks such as JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Standard Chartered, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and others necessarily against a ‘bond run’ and wider trashing of US debt?  Or not so much?  Who benefits?  More specifically, who profits?

In this episode of Money & Fear, we’ll review some monetary and political history involving Wall Street and Beijing in order to weigh the mentioned factors.  Details not shared, let alone analyzed, by mainstream corporate business press supposedly reporting on US-China trade, tariffs and/or currency wars, even.

If you’re not a Newsbud member yet, please join and tell others.  It costs practically nothing, yet gives you information you’re not supposed to know, thus empowering you to stay ahead of the herd and think like Establishment planners think.

*Follow us here at Newsbud Twitter

**Subscribe here at BFP-Newsbud YouTube Channel

Watch Episode Preview

Watch Members Only Full Episode Here

***Subscribing Members must be logged in to see the full video

Featured Video MP3 Audio Clip

***Subscribing Members must be logged in to listen to the audio

Show Notes

JPMorgan's China News Is Great...for China- Bank shareholders may want to temper their excitement

JPMorgan Gains Entry to China's Bond Market, a First for U.S. Banks

JPMorgan gets China corporate bond underwriting license


China's bond market to surpass Japan as world's second largest in five years: UBS

China bond index inclusion to see $286 bln passive inflows -StanChart

Goldman Sachs, China's CIC to launch up to $5 billion fund: sources

China GDP Annual Growth Rate

Foreign Direct Investment in China by Edward Graham & Erika Wada (white paper)

JPMorgan Chase Allowed to Conduct Interbank Bond Settlement

China Moves Forward With Further Bond Market Opening

New China bond licences raise more questions

Why Is China Excluded From Global Bond Indices?

JP Morgan soothes fears of busted flush in China

JPMorgan says panda bond sales to grow, diversify

We haven't heard JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon go this dark on China in a long time

Could China's Banks Take Down the Global Economy?

JPMorgan fined for hiring kids of China's elite to win business

Rockefeller family's connection with China

The Oil Prince’s Legacy: Rockefeller Philanthropy in China

America & China, Part 1: Rockefeller Origins

America & China Part II: Interregnum

America & China Part III: The Great Deal

America and China Part IV: The Big Balance Sheet Boondoggle

Masters of Metal: China, the Rothschild Fix, and the “New World Currency”

Trump’s China Entourage: Heavy With Goldman Sachs, Rothschild, CFR Globalists


Towards Capitalist Restoration?: Chinese Socialism after Mao

Wealth and Power: China's Long March to the Twenty-first Century

Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Great Power, 1850 to the Present

Memoirs: By David Rockefeller

*For additional footnotes and links refer to the Newsbud article link above

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.




  2. immortalist says:

    Great report with so many resources. It has never been clearer that “communism” is an economic force and that “communism” and capitalism are but two sides of the same coin. In either case the patriarchal ruling class authority has power. It also shows that Mao actually do something for the Chinese people and Chinese women particularly, but that at the end of the day, Rockefeller invested in China so that soon we in the West will all “enjoy” Chinese-level wages. It is significant that Ian did not mention the outsourcing motivating this move — as they invested in China they divested from the US — and quoted the official Rockefeller sources. I would have preferred some more critical sources that didn’t use terms like “philanthropy” and some discussion of the ROTHSCHILDS, which Rockefeller is an agent of, we know. At the end of the day, we know that the Jewish banks and financiers are running this operation, and that there are other geopolitical ends connected with that, that are not connected here, because we as with all international Jewish operations, have a goy out in front. Good report. Still wanting more. Thanks for your work, Pye and Newsbud!

    • Thanks for your comment. The mention in the piece of large global conglomerate banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and most certainly Goldman Sachs … should’ve been synonymous with the legacy power & ownership interests of the Rothschild banking dynasty. I assumed viewers would know, but perhaps I should’ve referenced it in more detail.

  3. William Field says:

    Wow what a brilliant report! Thankyou so Pye…..Well here is my 10 cents worth (as a Musician/Artist interested in obtaining sensible global development & peace)….Possibility 1) The Politicians on both sides will collude to ramp up the illusion of a “China Cold War” THREAT in order to keep feeding both of their almost $2 Trillions P.A. PUBLIC money going into their MIC’s monster… (Which is Economically & politically anachronistic in this day & age)…& to enhance their own pretence of “indispensability” “Importance”… & gain more “Power & other benefits” (for themselves & their “benefactors”). …& Possibility 2 is (And this I posit is what the Chinese will know from so many past horrendous western Empire abuses & betrayals AND will act on) This is all a big “Bait the hook to catch Fish” game to ultimately, at some point, infiltrate & get “Total Control” & “World Domination”….possibly that is why Chinese are militarising at such speed! …I also suspect The Rockefeller “Enterprise” & engagement globally has NEVER really been philanthropic…thats the front to ingratiate & infiltrate (& Govt backed too)…to ultimately profit/subjugate……..My guess is The China Cold War will be a “Dog & Pony Show” & “A Mexican Stand Off” UNTIL something might go accidentally or on purpose wrong …& then “Duck & Weave” folks. It is all utterly unnecessary …PS AFAIK Rockefeller has financed Murdock from the get go….Rothschild has backed The Economist…you can bet this kind of “Media Baron backing money” has also been the money behind “The ubiquitous Narrative” from the handful of other Western Media owners… Someone please, who is not a paid shill for the Empire, tell me what I might be overlooking! Cheers all.

  4. Quantu Infinita says:

    Thank you for this very valuable researched piece, Pye.

  5. Ryan Stock says:

    Is there any way I can adjust the speed of the video ?

    ; _ ;

  6. Richard Williams says:

    Amazing analysis. How do you research, compile and collate all this information? It reminded me a little of Antony Sutton’s insightful analysis of cooperation between American business and the Soviet Union, transporting huge amounts of machinery and equipment over the Bering Straits. American industry helped Hitler to fight the war. Communism and fascism are both ideal forms of social and political organisation for monopoly capitalists. It was Milton Friedman’s Chicago boys who advised Pinochet.
    You have made repeated brief reference to Hegel in your contributions. What do you mean by this?

  7. CuChulainn says:

    thanks for this very stimulating analysis. and thanks especially for the copious bibliography!!

    the apparent antithesis of chinese “communism” to western capitalism disappears when we recognize, as you document so well, that Chinese state capitalism, like that of the Soviet Union, has nothing to do with what Marx meant by communism, but has rather been a necessary stage in the rapid forced march of both countries into global capitalism. capital chases the value to be found in markets at an earlier stage of their development, in accordance with Marx’s theory of tendential declining rates of profit. the saturated markets of the West are less attractive to global capital than those markets where profitable development lies ahead.

    so, as you suggest, it does appear that the opening of the Chinese bond market to western capital is indeed a harbinger of a forthcoming & mathematically inevitable collapse in US bond markets. will the US military establishment tolerate this, even as global “US” financial firms may benefit? certainly the biggest investors behind those firms will benefit.

    hard to beat the returns on these equity funds, are China bond funds the next big investment?

  8. CuChulainn says:

    Rockefeller & now also Rothschild central gearing up for war against China & Russia; are global capital pools ready to sacrifice London? or is it all exuberant theater?

    On Wednesday, February 21st, the UK’s Minister of Defence, Conservative Gavin Williamson, announced that the United Kingdom is changing its fundamental defence strategy from one that’s targeted against non-state terrorists (Al Qaeda, etc.), to one that’s targeted instead against three countries: Russia, China, and North Korea. He acknowledged that a massive increase in military spending will be needed for this, and that “savings” will have to be found in other areas of Government-spending, such as the health services…

  9. Bravo, very interesting discussion of many topics I’ve not heard about elsewhere.

    I appreciate that your delivery is clear. Your pacing seems to be “gentler”, giving me more time to absorb and integrate, form a mental picture. Thanks and if in doubt go slower and not faster! 🙂 Those pauses are helpful for comprehension, crucial as you are presenting important new ideas and questions.

    Regarding the commenter above who asked about Rothschilds, and your response, that might indeed be an interesting topic for a future segment. Much of our shared history has never been mentioned.

  10. cameron jones says:

    Could you please do a follow up on western banks and the Soviet Union? There’s a lot about that from Anthony sutton. Maybe try and explain why it collapsed and if the western banks are still interested in Russia or whether they’ve moved to China. (Though Russia is still the richest country in terms of natural resources)

Speak Your Mind