The Deep State Plan to Sabotage Korean Peace

Recently the Asia punditsphere was abuzz with excited comments on an ABC news report “North Korea has increased nuclear production at secret sites, say U.S. officials

As to the assertion that North Korea is cranking out fissile material at one or two secret processing facilities, so what?  Kim Jong un said he’s stop missile and nuclear tests but never said he’d stop processing.

In practical terms, this appears to be an effort to make a Korea deal—and the lifting of sanctions against North Korea—impossible, by establishing the “these guys are liars and can’t be trusted ever!” frame.

This would not be the first time interested parties reached out to sabotage Korean peace negotiations. And it would not even be the second. It’s at least the third.

In a special edition, China Watch explores the sixty year record of U.S. bad faith and sabotage of Korean peace negotiations and presents a special video report on one of the biggest and therefore least admitted blunders in US mismanagement of Asian affairs: the botched campaign against a Macau bank that birthed North Korea’s atomic bomb.

*Follow us here at Newsbud Twitter

**Subscribe here at BFP-Newsbud YouTube Channel

***Newsbud on Vimeo 

Show notes

North Korea has increased nuclear production at secret sites, say U.S. officials

Suspicions persist about Iranian ‘laptop of death’

The CIA’s Mop-Up Man: L.A. Times Reporter Cleared Stories With Agency Before Publication

Mark Dubowitz tweet re Anthony Ruggiero

Failure to sanction China helped North Korea, former officials say

General MacArthur’s Conspiracy to Start a War with China! New Documentary Release & Interview!

For purchase at Newsbud Store or for Purchase or View via Amazon or Vimeo

The Korean War was a desperate and dubious battle in which the US was ready to try anything and everything to overcome its strategic and tactical disadvantages.  Biological weapons, nuclear weapons…and Douglas MacArthur’s plans for a strategic breakout via escalation of the Korean conflict to a regional war.  Everything was on the table.

Douglas MacArthur made the first US attempt to parlay a Korean crisis into an existential confrontation with the People’s Republic of China.  With the US milsec establishment, his ideas are more popular—and dangerous—than ever.  My documentary uses first hand testimony and declassified archives to finally reveal the truth behind this long-suppressed event. 

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.


  1. Juan Rios says:

    Mr. Lee is a man of principle; I appreciate his integrity very very much.

  2. Juan Rios says:

    I RESPECT YOUR ANALYSIS BUT I part ways with your views, in terms of motivation(s) and actual happenings, with respect to MacArthur. He saw communism as a wholly and utterly subversive [ideological] threat to “Western” society. What MacArthur never realized was the existing capitulation of the agents in power to the same authority crafting “Western” society and shaping military endeavor. The same enterprising power priming the inception of political communism, as theater, while concurrently (finances) securing its spread. In the dichotomy of the world stage, State functions are expressed via engagement to/with [an] equilateral opponent(s) and I do not believe MacArthur ever came to terms (until perhaps it was already too late) with this fact; the Master he served harbors very different aims and biases from those to which he willingly co-opted his person and loyalties. He likely [falsely] reasoned they were congruent to his own (veni vidi vici) and any anomaly therefore was merely “parva res semel” as the majority of his compatriots, assuredly those issuing command, were steadfastly rooted in like socialization(s). The governing authorities claiming subscription to such ideas, those bearing the afore mentioned designation by Geographic region, who supposedly persist doggedly in opposition to that which they tout as the “antithesis” and proclaim their desire to destroy (communism) are, in reality, strategically feigning opposition; it is more myth than pedagogy.

    However, unbeknownst to a geopolitically myopic MacArthur, the powers that be were actually facilitating the groundwork to secure an effective means of control over guidance of future events, advancement(s) and growth across multiple sectors and continents. The purpose for which completely eluded him until, as previously noted, it was already too late. MacArthur was stuck in his propagandistic notion that his cause was noble and true; a denunciation of communism as evidence of a desire to bring it to ruin irrespective of a total lack of action, existence in demonstration, via policy that tacitly supported said position. Therefore, any subsequent “endgame” would be the military and economic objective of HIS side. A passionate MacArthur, however, missed seeing that it was only one means to one end. He thus wished to proceed [as was planned] because he quite incorrectly believed his Master was desirous of a stated result; an end to communism.
    I think he probably starts to entertain the notion that Washington’s (D.C.) roses aren’t so floral in nature when a potential military victory is scuttled on the un-factual and (for MacArthur) heretofore imperceptible basis that USSR engagement generates a fear of failure among the military brass, strategists and/or politicians. Perhaps the concept of what the agenda really might be, what power (real power) is or how perhaps his own worth was being tallied began to circulate in his mind. Surely ideas about Truman not really possessing intrinsic final authority or how, despite any praise or accolades to the contrary, he was merely a disposable minion (devoid of pro se insights/leanings) began to substantially take hold when, for the first time ever, his feet were compelled Westward by a force exterior to his person; the previously impossible concept of a revered General’s exodus on grounds of “insubordination” seeing fruition as the owners play both sides against the middle. They weren’t about to let some noble minded “patriot” ruin their shrewdly guided geopolitical positioning of North Korea for future use (a WWIII “trigger event”); that was yet for some time. He went along willingly- just as those who practice in like capacity today thusly so do- whether or not the bliss of ignorance still glows brightly from within.
    The summation being:

    MacArthur acted in accordance with his tightly held political indoctrinations, views and beliefs conscientiously reinforced, because he considered the alternative, which was the reality of events, a concept so foreign and “un-American” it could not possibly reflect the truth of the matter; but it did. He was deceived, as are ALL who support the governments of man, by the same force operating within them from the beginning. Ergo, when you demonstrate by your act(s) and/or action(s) that you are unwilling to change for truth, your sin becomes your own conscious doing and your deception a continual product/consequence of it; the/any consequences of such affiliation(s) are thus brought about by the deceptive self-reliant attitude(s) and disposition that guides all who are part of the World and subject to its ruler; marked accordingly.

  3. Mattias Soederholm says:

    Thanks Peter, you’re great!

Speak Your Mind