CoronaVirus- My Final Message: While We’re Quarantined …

Watch Full Episode

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.

Comments

  1. Touché.
    Thank you.
    The wurlitzer turned to blunderbuss .
    And, trigger pulled, stuxnet-type fear ‘viruses’ implanted by years of MSM ‘suggestion’ in the collective subconscious (
    received their ‘command hallucination’
    and off we all run..
    down the channel rails
    down past the yards
    to erewhon.
    (As they said on the farm; you want to move the stock? first open the gate)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_gMT4_PDJI
    “U.N. chief Antonio Guterres warned that a global recession, “perhaps of record dimensions”, was a near certainty…“We are in an unprecedented situation and the normal rules no longer apply.” ‘The Normal Rules No Longer Apply.’ Ah. Those words of magic to Deepsnake. Aggressive WHO and NWO agenda ride the ‘PvSiYrOuPs’ Tsunami : https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/coronavirus-gordon-brown-calls-for-new-global-government-to-fight-impact-of-covid-19/ar-BB11JU79
    Cue Bono.
    There is a LOT of money to follow.

    • For instance:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_gMT4_PDJI
      ‘Neil Fergusson (Imperial College) warned of 500,000 UK deaths (himself now tested positive Covrt-..sorry, covid-19) NOW says virus will probably kill under 20,000 in UK, more than half of whom would have died by years end because so old and sick anyway.
      Fergusson had been earlier criticised by Oxford Epidemiologist Sunetra Gupta, reported in the Financial Times saying ‘II am surprised with such unqualified acceptance of the Imperial Model.’
      Professor Gupta’s model suggested virus had been invisibly spreading in UK at least a month earlier than suspected, concluding as many as half UK already were infected. And that if modelling was accurate, meant fewer than 1 in 1000 would become sick enough tor hospital..the vast majority free from symptoms. Meaning Fergusson’s highly influential model was out by orders of magnitude.’

  2. Robert Diggins says:

    Thanks remo!

    FYI
    Here’s an excerpt from a NYT piece at the end of 2017:
    NYT/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih.html

    [Dec. 19, 2017

    Federal officials on Tuesday ended a moratorium imposed three years ago on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal.

    Such work can now proceed, said Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, but only if a scientific panel decides that the benefits justify the risks.

    Some scientists are eager to pursue these studies because they may show, for example, how a bird flu could mutate to more easily infect humans, or could yield clues to making a better vaccine.

    Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic…

    …Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said he believed some laboratories could do such work safely, but wanted restrictions on what they could publish.

    “If someone finds a way to make the Ebola virus more dangerous, I don’t believe that should be available to anybody off the street who could use it for nefarious purposes,” he said.

    “Physicists long ago learned to distinguish between what can be publicly available and what’s classified,” he added, referring to nuclear weapons research. “We want to keep some of this stuff on a need-to-know basis.”]

    Perfectly reasonable, right? Sure sounds that way, because, you know, oversight really exists, classification is never abused, and stuff.

    And here’s that same Michael Osterholm, on Joe Rogan, Mar 10, 2020.

    At 20:38
    “We could not have crafted a virus like this, to do what it’s doing. I mean, we don’t have the creative imagination or the skillset.”

    It’s important not to jump to conclusions, as there are natural ways for this virus to have occurred, just as there is published literature showing we (humans) have manipulated those natural processes in the engineering of other types of virus, specifically H1N1 and the use of about 10 generations of ferrets to get what they wanted.

    I recently had a long conversation with a Coronavirologist. Yes, that’s a specialty and there aren’t many of them. He suspects that more money will pour in though.

    There is a process that is well understood, but is, according to him, unlikely to be used. He said that none of his colleagues suspected that this was engineered. That’s important to consider.

    I think he began to understand, through our conversation and, more importantly, with another neurobiologist who has been researching this possibility, that saying the opposite, that engineering this is impossible, is also not correct.

    As we see with every crisis and emergency, there are those who automatically assume complete innocence or guilt of the Establishment. This is irresponsible on both sides.

    What I understand now, after some time researching the possibilities with experts, who I found to have integrity beyond bias, is that, although it definitely is possible, it is not provable at this point. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t become a little more cognizant about what kind of research is being done and what oversight needs to exist. I was pleasantly surprised at the real research/investigation and conversation going on. There are concerned people who aren’t holding their tongues. But finding people with integrity, instead of ideological bias and knee jerk reaction tendencies, is like finding a needle in the rough or a diamond in a haystack…or like finding Sibel.

    What’s more practical is the focus on our reaction to the macro issues Sibel is bringing up. The gangsters of global chess and destabilization and hubristic terror-driven colonization. We don’t need to prove anything about the viruses itself, to see the exploitation and to make some noise about it.

    I expect the coming episodes from Sibel to lay out the strategic exploitation of the public with precise focus and historical precedent, per usual.

    Hope this helps,
    Robert

    P.S. I don’t trust Dr. Osterholm. I see lies by omission as part of his announced strategy for public health and safety.

  3. Mark Ribbit says:

    Thanks Sibel. Short and sweet but goes right to the heart of the matter!

Speak Your Mind